Xref: utzoo rec.video:13153 sci.electronics:12637 rec.ham-radio:21422 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekfdi!videovax!bill From: bill@videovax.tv.tek.com (William K. McFadden) Newsgroups: rec.video,sci.electronics,rec.ham-radio Subject: Re: HDTV and Waveform Modulation Keywords: HDTV waveform PSI Message-ID: <5867@videovax.tv.tek.com> Date: 27 Jun 90 16:23:51 GMT References: <4454@milton.u.washington.edu> Reply-To: bill@videovax.tv.tek.com (William K. McFadden) Followup-To: rec.video Organization: Tektronix TV Measurement Systems, Beaverton OR Lines: 23 This is the GENESYS system that was first introduced about two years ago. As I recall, it stirred quite a controversy due to its "black magic" nature and sketchy details as to how the system worked. A lot of engineers were claiming it violated the laws of physics. I saw Mr. Geddes present a paper on the system at the 1989 NAB convention. My coworkers and I couldn't tell if it was real or snake oil. They also had a demonstration that wasn't working when I went to see it. A coworker said they sort of got it working the next day (apparently there was a lot of crosstalk between the two "channels"). At this year's NAB, another paper was presented that gave a lot more detail on the system and outlined plans for testing it on the air. This time around, it seemed more like a real system, but still had some "snake oil" aspects to it. However, the jury is still out at least until the tests are completed. Personally, I think it would be great if the system works, but you don't get something for nothing. I think we'll have to give up something to get two video broadcasts on the same channel. Whether it's something we're willing to give up is another story. -- Bill McFadden Tektronix, Inc. P.O. Box 500 MS 58-639 Beaverton, OR 97077 bill@videovax.tv.tek.com, {hplabs,uw-beaver,decvax}!tektronix!videovax!bill Phone: (503) 627-6920 "The biggest difference between developing a missle component and a toy is the 'cost constraint.'" -- John Anderson, Engineer, TI