Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uc!nic.MR.NET!nic.stolaf.edu!news
From: hannum@mahler.psu.edu (Charles Hannum)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: problems with [] operator
Message-ID: <1990Jul6.131550.2915@acc.stolaf.edu>
Date: 6 Jul 90 13:15:50 GMT
References: <27893@ethz-inf.UUCP> <1990Jul6.125741.28182@acc.stolaf.edu>
Sender: news@acc.stolaf.edu
Organization: The Pennsylvania State University Public NeXT Laboratory
Lines: 18
In-Reply-To: hannum@mahler.psu.edu's message of Fri, 6 Jul 90 12:57:41 GMT


In article <1990Jul6.125741.28182@acc.stolaf.edu> hannum@mahler.psu.edu (Charles Hannum) writes:

   ...
   foo[] returns a foobar, not a foobar*.  To demonstrate:
   ...


Er, before someone else corrects me, let me do it myself:

   foo[] returns a foobar&, not a foobar*.  To demonstrate:

--
 
Virtually,
Charles Martin Hannum		 "Those who say a thing cannot be done should
Please send mail to:		  under no circumstances stand in the way of
hannum@schubert.psu.edu		  he who is doing it." - a misquote