Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!sumax!nwnexus!happym!irv
From: irv@happym.wa.com (Irving Wolfe)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
Subject: Re: local adress problem
Message-ID: <7@happym.wa.com>
Date: 12 Jul 90 04:26:08 GMT
References: <1990Jul10.000213.4942@cs.umn.edu> <2699CB8F.A35@tct.uucp>
Organization: Happy Man Corp., Seattle
Lines: 17

In <2699CB8F.A35@tct.uucp> chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) writes:

>This behavior is a feature. . . .  So don't bother suggesting that the 
>feature be removed -- we use it. 

Okay, if you use it and you are an expert, there are at least sometimes good
reasons to use it.  I really believe you.  But I'm _not_ an expert -- my
greatest expertise is in investing -- so even though I believe you, I don't
understand.

How about sharing these reasons with the rest of us who haven't yet figured 
out why we should be doing this? 

-- 
 Irving Wolfe    Happy Man Corp.   irv@happym.wa.com    206/463-9399 ext.101
 SOLID VALUE, the investment letter for Benj. Graham's intelligent investors
 Information (not sample) free: email patty@happym.wa.com with US mail addr.