Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!cornell!uw-beaver!sumax!polari!dsp From: dsp@polari.UUCP (Don Smith) Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: NEW FOUNDATION ESTABLISHED TO ENCOURAGE COMPUTER-BASED COMMUNICATIONS POLICIES Summary: Freedom of Speech / Lawsuits Message-ID: <2198@polari.UUCP> Date: 12 Jul 90 17:06:12 GMT References: <5122@fernwood.mpk.ca.us> <1421@pta.oz.au> Organization: Seattle Online Public Unix (206) 328-4944 Lines: 71 In article <1421@pta.oz.au>, major@pta.oz.au (Major) writes: > geoff@fernwood.mpk.ca.us (Geoff Goodfellow) writes: > > >[Mitch Kapor asked me to post the following] > >NEW FOUNDATION ESTABLISHED TO ENCOURAGE COMPUTER-BASED COMMUNICATIONS > >POLICIES > > If Mitch is so concerned to protect freedom of 'communication in > the electronic age' poerhaps he could start by pressing on his > company (Lotus) to stop sueing enveryone who thinks that 'P' is > a good command for 'Print you spreadsheet'. > > The man's hypocracy is astounding! > > Major > major@pta.oz.au I assume that you're refering to the lawsuits brought by Lotus in response to the recent ruling that the copyright on the command structure of 1-2-3 has been infringed upon.C I disagree with the Major about any hypocracy (sic). When dealing with patents, trademarks and copyrights the one word that I sort of disagree with is the "intellectual" in "intellectual property". If you should invent something or create a piece of art it certainly is the product of you intellect but many other things that you've done are only expressed intellectually. There are property laws concerning real estate and personal property. Laws which keep for instance a family from creating a productive farm through the labour of generations only to have that farm declared public property. I'm no computer programmer but I'd hate to spend years of my time working on a project and have it declared to be in the public domain or perceived as being in that domain so that other's will create derivitive works from my years of effort. I believe that the thoery concerning patents is that a basic contract exists between you and the Government. In exchange for making your invention public in the form of the patent itself you are granted remedies in court should someone else use your invention and for instance degrade it's inherent itegrity by changing a few things. I believe that the exchange of information concerning the state of the art in all fields is in the requesting and reading of the issued patent itself. I know that for myself it seems quite slow to write the Patent & Trademark office (PTO) for a copy of a patent that has just been granted. This really hit home since I've been on the net but there does exist a commercial service which will find the most recent patent you're interested in and fax a copy to you. Free speech is one thing and admire the support of Lotus and Apple in regard to the recend Operation Sun Devil. Having someone steal or use your property, your car, your real property, your house, your personal property is something that I disagree with in the same way that I would hate for someone to steal the product of my mind, soul, knowledge and "intellect". Perhaps the problem is that programmer's don't view themselves as the artists that they are. Don a dsp@polari.UUCP uw-beaver!sumax!polari!dsp B B B B B B B B B