Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bu.edu!snorkelwacker!usc!cs.utexas.edu!oakhill!news
From: dees@sid.sps.mot.com (Randy Dees)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: KFatPath: Reliability?
Message-ID: <3519@oakhill.UUCP>
Date: 12 Jul 90 14:48:24 GMT
References: <9007112021.aa14068@gallia.ux.King.AC.UK>
Sender: news@oakhill.UUCP
Reply-To: dees@sid.sps.mot.com (Randy Dees)
Organization: Motorola MOS Telecom
Lines: 16

In article <9007112021.aa14068@gallia.ux.King.AC.UK>, is_s440@ux.kingston.ac.uk
writes:
> 
> Have any other KFP users had problems - especially with boxes of
> a similar age? I wonder whether there was some design fault, now
> fixed (or not as the case may be).
> 
Our network has more than 75 fastpaths on it and haven't had that many
problems with the boxes. new boxes have continually been added to the 
network over the past 3-4 years. last year we converted our old fastpath 
3's to fastpath 4's. some fastpath 4's had a problem with the
power supply connection, but that's the first thing they would check
and fix if a box were returned to them for repair.--
-<(randy dees)>-
dees@sid.sps.mot.com   or 
uunet!motsps!sid.sps.mot.com!dees or 4100768@mcimail.com