Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcsun!i2unix!inria!laas!ralph From: ralph@laas.fr (Ralph P. Sobek) Newsgroups: comp.robotics Subject: Re: Micro rovers vs. Stompers Message-ID: Date: 9 Jul 90 14:24:19 GMT References: <9792@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <838@sagpd1.UUCP> <11723@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> Sender: news@laas.laas.fr Reply-To: ralph@laas.fr Organization: LAAS-CNRS France Lines: 14 In-reply-to: cg108f3@icogsci1.ucsd.edu's message of 3 Jul 90 23:11:46 GMT In article <11723@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> cg108f3@icogsci1.ucsd.edu (Pete Dapkus) writes: | You wouldn't need to send the mother base again. Just | put it somewhere safe. It could even be a start at colonizing mars. Somewhere safe? Why not just leave it in orbit? Of course, the battery recharging would have to be rethought out. -- Ralph P. Sobek Disclaimer: The above ruminations are my own. ralph@laas.fr Addresses are ordered by importance. ralph@laas.uucp, or ...!uunet!laas!ralph If all else fails, try: sobek@eclair.Berkeley.EDU =============================================================================== Reliable software should kill people reliably! -Andy Mickel, Pascal News #13,78