Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!amelia!eos!woody From: woody@eos.UUCP (Wayne Wood) Newsgroups: comp.robotics Subject: Re: Divert NASA budget to robotics Message-ID: <6907@eos.UUCP> Date: 10 Jul 90 18:48:39 GMT References: <10518@batcomputer.tn.cornell.edu> <9855@pt.cs.cmu.edu> Reply-To: woody@eos.UUCP (Wayne Wood) Distribution: comp Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Calif. Lines: 32 In article <9855@pt.cs.cmu.edu> gerry@cive.ri.cmu.edu (Gerry Roston) writes: >Finally a post I can agree with 100%!!! >Who needs man in space? The cost is astronomical (pun intended) >and the return minimal. Man's greatest advantage over most robots >is his highly advanced manipulative skills coupled with a wizbang >computer. In a space suit, the manipulative ability is all but lost. >There will certainly (I hope) be a time when establishing a permanent >manned presence in space is called for, but now is not the time. this is foolishness... *WE* need men in space. Mankind cannot stay on this planet and hope to survive forever. We are already starting to feel the population pressures and also the economic pressures from the constant drain on non-renewable resources. Granted, there are many things a robot can do which man is not necessarily needed for. The deep-space probes we have been sending up over the past few years are prime examples, as are the planetary probes. But only man can colonize. One might well have asked if the was a need for a permanent human presence on the high seas in the 15th century (and earlier). That frontier was every bit as alien and hostile as the one we currently are exploring. You say there may someday be a need for a manned presence in space, but not now. I say, if not now, when? /*** woody **************************************************************** *** ...tongue tied and twisted, just an earth bound misfit, I... *** *** -- David Gilmour, Pink Floyd *** ****** woody@eos.arc.nasa.gov *** my opinions, like my mind, are my own ******/