Xref: utzoo comp.sources.d:5583 gnu.misc.discuss:1207
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!decwrl!shelby!neon!neon!gumby
From: gumby@Cygnus.COM (David Vinayak Wallace)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Lotus 1-2-3 was compiled with GNU C compiler!?
Message-ID: <GUMBY.90Jul11234909@Cygnus.COM>
Date: 12 Jul 90 06:49:09 GMT
References: <17032@haddock.ima.isc.com> <2699D59A.D60@tct.uucp>
	<3141@rsiatl.UUCP>
Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Followup-To: comp.sources.d
Organization: Cygnus Support
Lines: 16
In-Reply-To: jgd@rsiatl.UUCP's message of 12 Jul 90 03:15:28 GMT


   Date: 12 Jul 90 03:15:28 GMT
   From: jgd@rsiatl.UUCP (John G. DeArmond)

   Yeah.. So OK, Mr Stallman, let's see if your esteemed GPL and the FSF
   has any balls.  Let's see some 1-2-3 source code.  Here's your 
   opportunity to make your mark on computing history..  Go for it.
   You have my support.

This makes no sense to me.  You can compile anything you want with
GCC.  The foundation has no claim and makes no claim on any code
compiled with a gnu compiler and more than it makes a claim on any
code edited with emacs.

The lotus port to the sun used the sun libraries.  I presume the port
which sparked this discussion used that vendor's libraries.