Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!udel!new
From: new@udel.EDU (Darren New)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Whats wrong with self Modifying Code?
Message-ID: <24396@estelle.udel.EDU>
Date: 12 Jul 90 21:56:07 GMT
References: <24379@snow-white.udel.EDU> <6171@helios.ee.lbl.gov>
Reply-To: new@ee.udel.edu (Darren New)
Organization: University of Delaware
Lines: 8

In article <6171@helios.ee.lbl.gov> jnmoyne@lbl.gov (Jean-Noel MOYNE) writes:
>     Anyway you can allways write non selfmodifying code which is fast >enough, 

Sometimes it's not just speed.  What about a Forth interpreter with CODE words?
These functions will compile down to machine code which may be run immediately
after compilation into memory. There MUST be an approved way to flush the cache 
without going through LoadSeg() or there will be some programs that just can't
be done.   Is it in there?   1/2 :-)                 -- Darren