Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!NISC.SRI.COM!cwilson
From: cwilson@NISC.SRI.COM (Chan Wilson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION: comp.sources.apple2
Message-ID: <18494@fs2.NISC.SRI.COM>
Date: 8 Jul 90 13:38:01 GMT
References: <Jul.4.21.11.54.1990.24360@paul.rutgers.edu> <18445@fs2.NISC.SRI.COM> <Jul.7.21.17.03.1990.27097@paul.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: cwilson@NISC.SRI.COM (Chan Wilson)
Organization: Network Information Center; SRI International
Lines: 25

In article <Jul.7.21.17.03.1990.27097@paul.rutgers.edu> jac@paul.rutgers.edu (Jonathan A. Chandross) writes:

[uhm.. various items.  read the article, eh?]

>What is wrong with:
>	comp.sys.apple2		discussions of Apple II material
>	comp.binaries.apple2	binaries for Apple II programs
>	comp.sources.apple2	sources for Apple II programs

Nuthin.  I haven't any problem with it.  I was sorta playing the 
devil's advocate... the only point I was really making was the low volume
on the binaries group easily allows for sources to be posted there.

Seems to be a fair amount of interest.  Shall someone propose a call for 
votes, or shall we haggle over this some more?  >:)

>Jonathan A. Chandross
>Internet: jac@paul.rutgers.edu

--Chan
			   ................
    Chan Wilson -- cwilson@nisc.sri.com <!> I don't speak for SRI.
Janitor/Architect of comp.binaries.apple2 archive on wuarchive.wustl.edu
			      "a2fx it!"
			   ................