Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:53945 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:59 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:226 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!ubc-cs!alberta!dvinci!news From: lowey@herald.usask.ca (Kevin Lowey) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: Whis is fastest 386/33 or 486/25 ? Message-ID: <1990Jul11.161138.13630@dvinci.usask.ca> Date: 11 Jul 90 16:11:38 GMT References: <1990Jul5.205440.23370@ecn.purdue.edu> Sender: news@dvinci.usask.ca Reply-To: lowey@herald.usask.ca Distribution: na Organization: University of Saskatchewan Lines: 38 From article <1990Jul5.205440.23370@ecn.purdue.edu>, by jmoore@cidmac.ecn.purdue.edu (James D Moore): > > I was asked to find out some information for a professor here at > the university. A project we are doing requires nothing more than > as much speed as possible from the processor. I realize that this > is related to disk acess and such but the basic question I need an > answer for is "Which is faster a 386/33mhz or a 486/25mhz?" I have a benchmark program that I wrote which does a lot of tests including the sieve, fibonacci, whetstone, integer math, floating math, trancendental math, etc. It was done in Turbo Pascal 3.0 so the compiler does no math optimizations, etc. Here are some of the final results (in seconds) which I obtained. Machine Name CPU MHz NO 80x87 With 80x87 IBM Model 80/486 486 25 26.80 10.92 DEC 325c 386 25 46.96 Zenith 386 386 25 51.25 20.93 IBM P70 386 20 74.92 IBM PS/2 80 386 16 91.66 Compaq 386 386 16 93.07 57.35 Primax 316SX 386sx 16 96.73 IBM PS/2 model 60 286 10 163.89 60.59 IBM PS/2 model 60 286 10 170.03 65.07 (OS/2 1.1 DOS box) IBM-AT 286 6 281.65 AT&T 6300 8086 ? 365.64 IBM-XT 8088 4.77 783.56 281.11 Amiga 2000 8088 4.77 797.41 (bridge card) Mac IIx 68030 16 1309.91 (Soft-PC 1.21 DOS emulation) That should give you a few comparisons. Unfortunately I haven't tested any 33Mhz 386 boxes. But at the same clock speed, the 486 chip appears to be about twice as fast as the 386 chip (in real mode at least) - Kevin Lowey