Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!cornell!vax8530!dhsy
From: dhsy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: SEX! (Now that we've got your attention...)
Message-ID: <4486.2694227d@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>
Date: 6 Jul 90 09:32:45 GMT
References: <9680.2690a1c5@amherst.bitnet> <290@imagine.ADMS-RAD.Unisys.COM>
Distribution: comp
Lines: 18

In article <290@imagine.ADMS-RAD.Unisys.COM>, chris@imagine.ADMS-RAD.Unisys.COM (Chris Sterritt) writes:
> In article <9680.2690a1c5@amherst.bitnet> amherasimchu@amherst.bitnet writes:
> 
>>It's a trend that I'd like to see stopped.  (Not by law, but by
>>taste.)
> 
> Hear hear!  I couldn't agree more.
> 

The editors must have been convinced that sexy covers would not drive
the real buyers away although some of them may have different taste 
(it's not porno magzine after all), but would lure some buyers who
would otherwise not interested in it.

Would somebody call for a boycott if they keep have the same kind of
cover design? guess nobody would. The readership would only increase.

dhsy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu