Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!haven!mimsy!mojo!russotto
From: russotto@eng.umd.edu (Matthew T. Russotto)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: RAM Chip Speed?
Message-ID: <1990Jul6.141044.4841@eng.umd.edu>
Date: 6 Jul 90 14:10:44 GMT
References: <26729@netnews.upenn.edu> <1990Jul5.183212.25939@eng.umd.edu> <26746@netnews.upenn.edu>
Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (The News System)
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity of Uniland, College Park
Lines: 19

In article <26746@netnews.upenn.edu> rubinoff@linc.cis.upenn.edu (Robert Rubinoff) writes:
>In article <1990Jul5.183212.25939@eng.umd.edu> russotto@eng.umd.edu (Matthew T. Russotto) writes:
>>In article <26729@netnews.upenn.edu> rubinoff@linc.cis.upenn.edu (Robert Rubinoff) writes
>>>[discussion of why SIMMS don't have to be (can't be) the same speed deleted]
>>Why don't you talk to the apple engineer who wrote the tech note on the
>>subject?  It may be misinformation, but it comes right out of the tech notes--
>>#176, written by Cameron Birse...
>
>True, but the tech note only says that the IIci requires the same speed within
>a row, not the other Macs.  And I've heard this alleged requirement long before
>the IIci came out.  

Wrong.  My copy of TN176, dated April '89 (I have new ones around here
somewhere...) has this little note on EVERY diagram, from the Plus through
the IIcx.
--
Matthew T. Russotto	russotto@eng.umd.edu	russotto@wam.umd.edu
][, ][+, ///, ///+, //e, //c, IIGS, //c+ --- Any questions?
		Hey!  Bush has NO LIPS!