Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!haven!umd5!steveg
From: steveg@umd5.umd.edu (Steve Green)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aux
Subject: Re: How can I get correct 'xinit' on X11R4
Message-ID: <6828@umd5.umd.edu>
Date: 6 Jul 90 02:33:52 GMT
References: <13127@shlump.nac.dec.com>
Reply-To: steveg@umd5.umd.edu (Steve Green)
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Lines: 33

In article <13127@shlump.nac.dec.com> furuta@tktv20.enet.dec.com (Akihiro Furuta) writes:
>Has anyone succeeded in starting X11R4 xinit? I could comple and link it,
>but when I started the image, I tried to run many XmacII! I used A/UX orginal
>cc and gcc, but I got the same problem. Are there any bugs in xinit?
>When I replaced the image with old one(X11R3), I could start Xwindow!

I dont think I understand what you are saying but one problem with 
init is that is requires full path names for its arguments.  xinit alone
works fine for me otherwise.

for example..

xinit /usr/bin/X11/xterm -geometry 60x8-2-2 -sb -rv -fn 6x10 -T "console" \
	-e $HOME/.x11start -- /usr/bin/X11/XmacII v -f 25 

or just plain..

xinit

both work for me.

>When I compled xcalc on gcc, I got assembler error message( illegal
>instructions, or something like that). What is the problem?

Dunno 'bout that one.. my xcalc works.

Are you using NFS by any chance?

--
What do these names have in common?
Bob, Flo, Augie, Curtis, Gordon, Rick, Rhonda, Meep, Bismark, Skip, Larson Petty
and Harry
	...did I miss any??			steveg@umd5.umd.edu