Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!mtha.usc.edu!engwall
From: engwall@mtha.usc.edu (Ralph Engwall)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: ESIX BBS (Was: Re: Interesting ISC Support Policy)
Keywords: ESIX, BBS
Message-ID: <25752@usc.edu>
Date: 7 Jul 90 09:20:23 GMT
References: <40800018@uicsl.csl.uiuc.edu> <608@tron.UUCP> <128@sysauto.UUCP>
Sender: news@usc.edu
Followup-To: comp.unix.i386
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 21

In article <128@sysauto.UUCP> olu@sysauto.UUCP (Olumide O. Emuleomo) writes:
>
>I have heard all sorts of nice things being said about ESIX and their 
>support policies?

Yes, I've been fairly satisfied with my ESIX System V (I've got rev C).

>I must say that I agree to a large extent.
>But how come they can't get their BBS to support 2400 baud modems?

I wonder about this too.  One reason I bought ESIX was because I don't have
a grand to blow on an operating system.  It should stand to reason that many
ESIX users don't have a grand to blow on a modem ether. ;-)




+-------------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|  R. Engwall             | Q: Why am I banging my head against the wall? |
|  engwall@mtha.usc.edu   | A: Because it feels *so* good when I stop.    |
+-------------------------+-----------------------------------------------+