Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!snorkelwacker!spdcc!tauxersvilli!alphalpha!nazgul From: nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: Motif -> Open Look look & feel Keywords: motif open look openlook Message-ID: <1990Jul3.201647.3436@alphalpha.com> Date: 3 Jul 90 20:16:47 GMT References: <2986@osc.COM> <1990Jun28.111050.17353@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> <138082@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <1990Jun29.033504.5003@ncsuvx.ncsu.edu> <1990Jul1.061632.20280@media.uucp> Organization: asi Lines: 41 In article <1990Jul1.061632.20280@media.uucp> rmf@media.uucp (Roger Fujii) writes: >willis@ecoult.ncsu.edu (Bill Willis) writes: >There are several vendors who DO NOT bundle Motif with their systems. >This poses several non-trivial problems. Which exist regardless of the toolkit you use. >Let's say a person writes an application with uil. He must choose one of these >headaches: > 1) the application will be HUGE (no shared libraries) One reason why no one in their right mind would use UIL :-). But it has nothing to do with the advantages or disadvantages of the Motif toolkit. > 2) distribute the shared libraries with the application and pay > OSF their distribution fee. > 3) Compatibility risks because the shared library that the user > provides (either vendor supplied or self generated) doesn't > work like they should. Note that if you wanted to use shared Xview libraries you would have exactly the same problem. Moreso - less vendors bundle xview. What has this got to do with Motif? >would be condemned to such a fate. Personally, I think it would be >great if vendors provided multiple interfaces and the the user pick and >choose, but OSF licensing would make this too cumbersome. Funny that Solbourne didn't think so. Sure I agree, it would be great. Too bad there isn't a toolkit in the world which is capable of *fully* supporting multiple GUIs. Why don't we start writing code now with what we've got instead of arguing about what we ought to have. I have no desire to be writing applications for OS/2 five years from now. -- Alphalpha Software, Inc. | motif-request@alphalpha.com nazgul@alphalpha.com |----------------------------------- 617/646-7703 (voice/fax) | Proline BBS: 617/641-3722 I'm not sure which upsets me more; that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.