Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian
From: stq@cbnewsi.att.com (Scott T Questad)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Re: Sexual sin
Message-ID: <Jul.7.23.45.15.1990.3844@athos.rutgers.edu>
Date: 8 Jul 90 03:45:16 GMT
Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 14
Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu

[In article <Jul.5.01.52.13.1990.190@athos.rutgers.edu>, 
zds-ux!bjstaff@uunet.uu.net comments that he sees homosexualiy as
part of a bigger issue, sexual sin in general.  He asks whether it
is any less sinful than premarital sex or adultery.  
> I understand that at one time each of these activities was considered
> evidence of a spiritual problem.  Are things really any different today?
> Donning asbestos clothing,
--clh]

No need for the asbestos wardrobe as far as I'm concerned.  Your point is well
taken.  One step further:  Is ongoing lying less sinful than extramatital or
homosexual sex?

-Scott Questad