Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!qucis!dalamb From: dalamb@qucis.queensu.CA (David Lamb) Newsgroups: comp.edu Subject: Re: Group projects Message-ID: <804@qusunitg.queensu.CA> Date: 18 Jul 90 16:03:33 GMT References: <18454@rpp386.cactus.org> <1522@abvax.UUCP> <1990Jul17.120036.8944@pdn.paradyne.com> Organization: Queen's University, Kingston Lines: 30 In article <1990Jul17.120036.8944@pdn.paradyne.com> reggie@dinsdale.paradyne.com (George W. Leach) writes: > BTW: I had been burnt on a number of group projects in the past >due to one member either just not showing up or not pulling his/her >weight. The group would receive a grade as a group, so the group was >responsible. Having to deal with the situation can be very much like >real life. I've run a group project course 7 times; three or four times someone wasn't pulling their weight. I handled this by 1. having about 1/2 of the work be "individual responsibility" (a couple of short essays, plus some parts of group deliverables that could be clearly identified. For example, I asked that specs for modules be written by individuals) 2. Having about 10% of the grade be "group participation", which I judged by observation of group meetings, by "general impression", by reading the required weekly logs, and by "personnel reviews" from the other team members. 3. For really obvious screwups, where someone completely dropped out of producing a joint deliverable, I graded them with very low participation (0 in one case), plus graded the individiual as a separate "team" that failed to hand in the particular deliverable they missed. I've never failed anyone yet, though; my worst cases still contributed something worth a passing grade, but failed to pull their weight at some particular point. David Alex Lamb ARPA Internet: David.Lamb@cs.cmu.edu Department of Computing dalamb@qucis.queensu.ca and Information Science uucp: ...!utzoo!utcsri!qucis!dalamb Queen's University phone: (613) 545-6067 Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6