Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!usc!apple!hercules!fernwood!portal!cup.portal.com!Rick_R_Kitts
From: Rick_R_Kitts@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Problems of Zortech C++ v2.1
Message-ID: <31804@cup.portal.com>
Date: 17 Jul 90 03:11:29 GMT
References: <82035@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <31714@cup.portal.com>
  <1990Jul16.145027.1434@tc.fluke.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 16


In article <something> <someone> says:

> [Your subject line says 2.1 but you say 2.06 in the article. Which is
> it?]

 Sorry, it is 2.06.

> [Too bad for you. ZTC generates good code from what I've seen].

 I am very happy for you. The fact remains, however, that I gave source
to 3 compilers (Zortech, a CFRONT, and Turbo C). 2 of those compilers ate
the source happily. Zortech was not one of those. Please feel free to
draw yor own conclusions.

---Rick