Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!stiatl!srchtec!johnb
From: johnb@srchtec.UUCP (John Baldwin)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Type of function returning function.
Message-ID: <122@srchtec.UUCP>
Date: 13 Jul 90 12:52:08 GMT
References: <1990Jul10.024205.17382@media.uucp> <1990Jul11.165805.14866@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Organization: search technology, inc.
Lines: 18

In article <1990Jul11.165805.14866@Neon.Stanford.EDU>,
 dkeisen@Gang-of-Four.Stanford.EDU (Dave Eisen) writes:
>
>int (*bar ()) ()
>{
>  return foo;
>}
>
>should work fine.
>

Not to the best of my knowledge.  "Bar" is already defined as a function
and here it is being defined again.  Or did you mean something different?
-- 
____________________________________________________________________________
John T. Baldwin			| The opinions expressed are not my own, nor
search technology, inc.		| do they belong to my employer.
johnb@srchtec.uucp		| They came from outer space.