Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!usc!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!texbell!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: LPI-C, why?
Message-ID: <Z7Q4G96@xds13.ferranti.com>
Date: 17 Jul 90 14:38:07 GMT
References: <LARRY.90Jul16161846@focsys.uucp> <17097@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 5

In article <17097@haddock.ima.isc.com> karl@kelp.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) writes:
> If you're not interested in ANSI C, then by all means keep using the old one.
> That's why we ship it under a separate name instead of just overwriting cc.

Shouldn't that name be "c89"?
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
+1 713 274 5180.
<peter@ficc.ferranti.com>