Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!stl!tom
From: tom@stl.stc.co.uk (Tom Thomson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional
Subject: Re: Id array comprehensions revisited
Keywords: Id, Haskell, poor array comprehensions
Message-ID: <3219@stl.stc.co.uk>
Date: 18 Jul 90 19:30:15 GMT
References: <51123@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>
Sender: news@stl.stc.co.uk
Reply-To: "Tom Thomson" <tom@stl.stc.co.uk>
Organization: STC Technology Limited, London Road, Harlow, Essex, UK
Lines: 10

In article <51123@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> jashley@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (J. Michael Ashley) writes:
>Can anybody else suggest a better definition for array comprehensions?  What
>about a "set" as a new data structure?
>
what's "new" about "set"?
Sets have been in Hope+ for a long time.
Perhaps the most interesting set of "set" facilities is in the
Hope+Unification variant of Hope+.

Tom Thomson