Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!jarthur!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!syd From: syd@DSI.COM (Syd Weinstein) Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm Subject: Re: Problems with Elm uuxqt Message-ID: <1990Jul18.131456.16237@DSI.COM> Date: 18 Jul 90 13:14:56 GMT References: <1990Jul17.214044.5482@supernet.UUCP> Reply-To: syd@DSI.COM Distribution: comp Organization: Datacomp Systems, Inc. Huntingdon Valley, PA Lines: 30 usenet@supernet.UUCP (Usenet Administrator) writes: :Someone else posted saying that they were having problems with elm possibly :munging headers. We, too, have suddenly started having similar problems with :elm, after 2 or 3 days of it running just fine. :Here is a returned message that I got just today: :Return-Path: :Date: Tue, 17 Jul 90 15:23:44 -0600 :To: supernet!root :Subject: uuxqt cmd (rmail robert ) status (signal 0, exit 67) :I beleive this is indentical to the previous poster's problem. We have, :however, had at least one other result; a signal 0, result 1. :This problem is distressing, since we had (have) high hopes for elm and would :like to see it work very well. First off, are you sure its Elm....... The return message is not enough to show anything, However, why would rmail exit with a status of 67? Elm got the headers right enough for the MTA to use uux and a rmail robert command, that actually should be enough for delivery. I would look elsewhere for this problem. I have not seen any problems with Elm and the headers yet, but if one is found, PLEASE show how the headers are being munged. -- ===================================================================== Sydney S. Weinstein, CDP, CCP Elm Coordinator Datacomp Systems, Inc. Voice: (215) 947-9900 syd@DSI.COM or dsinc!syd FAX: (215) 938-0235