Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bob From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains Subject: Re: long names, from dnet.test Message-ID: Date: 13 Jul 90 14:30:35 GMT References: <9007121446.AA07542@stag.math.lsa.umich.edu> <9007121507.AA09524@venera.isi.edu> Sender: usenet@MorningStar.COM (USENET Administrator) Reply-To: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Distribution: inet Organization: Morning Star Technologies Lines: 10 In-Reply-To: pvm@VENERA.ISI.EDU's message of 12 Jul 90 15:06:59 GMT In article <9007121507.AA09524@venera.isi.edu> pvm@VENERA.ISI.EDU (Paul Mockapetris) writes: I can't wait for X.400 addresses as components of UUCP paths. That won't happen, but they may appear as components of news paths. It all depends upon how MHS IPM's "flow confidentiality" requirement (X.400/15.4) is interpreted in light of a distributed flood-based non-presubscribed conference system technology like news. The ISO world may live in the distribution list paradigm forever. Consider my musings in ("ISO conferencing?") in comp.protocols.iso and news.misc.