Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!daver!tscs!tct!chip From: chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: The BITNET munge. Message-ID: <26A34997.6288@tct.uucp> Date: 17 Jul 90 17:23:35 GMT References: <269DC7FD.5AD4@tct.uucp> <269DC6A1.5A53@tct.uucp> Organization: ComDev/TCT, Sarasota, FL Lines: 29 According to flee@guardian.cs.psu.edu (Felix Lee): >Chip Salzenberg : >>Didn't anyone on BITNET think of passing articles along in ASCII and >>translating them AFTER retransmitting them? > >Keep two copies of every article? Why? The bulk of news is english >text and doesn't require high fidelity. True. Such a mechanism could be used for the sources groups only. It wouldn't be hard to maintain a list of them. >>As far as I'm concerned, if they can't be troubled to translate ASCII >>without lossage, munged sources are their own problem. > >"they" are really only a few sites that are doing Usenet<->BITNET >gatewaying. And the sites behind those gateways have the power to seek their newsfeeds elsewhere if their current gateways are unsatifactory. >I don't believe in catering to broken transmission paths either, but I >don't know of any pure data paths for news. I'm not looking for perfection; but I'm not going to give up my curly braces without a fight, either. :-) -- Chip Salzenberg at ComDev/TCT , "Most of my code is written by myself. That is why so little gets done." -- Herman "HLLs will never fly" Rubin