Xref: utzoo gnu.misc.discuss:1251 comp.sources.d:5648 Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!snorkelwacker!usc!jarthur!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!amelia!sun418!truesdel From: truesdel@sun418.nas.nasa.gov (David A. Truesdell) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.sources.d Subject: Re: The Official Word on Citations in FSF Works Message-ID: Date: 18 Jul 90 19:38:12 GMT References: <1990Jul3.111026.19698@twinsun.com> <3014@skye.ed.ac.uk> <8015@ncar.ucar.edu> <1990Jul18.145521.11726@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: news@amelia.nas.nasa.gov Lines: 15 gsh7w@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg S. Hennessy) writes: >In article <8015@ncar.ucar.edu> thor@stout.atd.ucar.edu (Rich Neitzel) writes: >#If I recall correctly, the book was cited in the original draft. >#Therefore removing it is indeed censorship. >No, removing the reference is editing. Please learn the difference >between censorship and editing. How true. It was childish, immature, picayune, intellectually dishonest, conceited and in bad taste, but it is not censorship. -- T.T.F.N., dave truesdell (truesdel@prandtl.nas.nasa.gov)