Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!sequent!cseaman From: cseaman@sequent.UUCP (Chris Seaman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: The A-590/2091 FFS problem Keywords: Location 0 Message-ID: <38886@sequent.UUCP> Date: 17 Jul 90 16:55:23 GMT References: <2085@gould.doc.ic.ac.uk> <6600012@okcusr.UUCP> <1449@nyx.UUCP> <1581@nyx.UUCP> Organization: Sequent Computer Systems, Beaverton, OR Lines: 48 bscott@nyx.UUCP (Ben Scott) writes: < cseaman@sequent.UUCP (Chris "I'm Outta Here, Man!" Seaman) writes: < >bscott@nyx.UUCP (Ben Scott) writes: < >< There's a simple, clean fix for this... < > < >Sorry, but this doesn't fix anything... < < Does too does too! At least it worked like a charm on my A-590. My explanation < of the actual cause may or may not have been accurate but the fix DOES work for < me and everyone I've heard about (until now). < < >[ ... ] Whatever the problem is, it is not in the filesystem. < < You may have hit on the problem... I mean, the only thing I can think of is < that it is NOT the 2091 that's doing this to your location zero. Check every < other program in your startup (even the normal C: commands) and see if it's < one of them. If you really are running version 1 of the 1.3.2 FFS, then I think < it's unlikely that it's trashing location zero. < < And what do you mean by "many" programs failing? I never found any that < actually died - most just exhibited that weird "gdos" string showing up or < reported errors after they finished doing their jobs. At any rate a program < affected by a trashed location zero is itself buggy, usually because of trying < to use an uninitialized pointer. < < . <<<>>> OK, here goes. My setup is/was not new with the 2091. It worked for over a year with a 2090a, with nary a problem. My startup sequence HAS NOT CHANGED since adding the 2091, other than to remove the commands which transferred control to the 2090a FFS partition. I have booted the machine (a 2500/20) from my generic, unmodified 1.3.2 disk, with the SAME results. I did a binary compare on the FastFileSystem which came with the 2091, and the one which came with 1.3.2, and they are identical. The file size is 12248. I am willing to try the fix suggested by Peter Cherna (although I have tried it three times already), and will report my results tomorrow. As far as which programs break, I realize that 'MANY' was probably too strong a word, but there are programs I need to use regularly that do go straight to the GURU when the address zero problem exists. These include Turbo Silver 3.0, and Post 1.1. I also realize that the fault lies with the program(s), and not with Commodore, but that doesn't correct anything. -- Chris (Insert phrase here) Seaman | /o -- -- -- cseaman@sequent ||| -- -- - I'm Outta Here, Man! ...!uunet!sequent!cseaman |vvvv/ -- -- - The Home of the Killer Smiley |___/ -- -- --