Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu
From: duncan@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Shan D Duncan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: C post increment
Message-ID: <5137@uwm.edu>
Date: 18 Jul 90 16:19:58 GMT
References: <13271@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Reply-To: duncan@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Lines: 19

From article <13271@cbmvax.commodore.com>, by ken@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ken Farinsky - CATS):
> In article <1990Jul18.020220.9502@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> dailey@kira.uucp (Chris Dailey) writes:
>>More importantly, how do you say it?  I've heard some people say "C
>>incremented", but I always say "C plus plus".
> 
> Common usage says "C plus plus" (although I think that this sounds stupid.)
> I prefer "C increment".  The first article I ever read on C++ said
> "C increment", all others have said "C plus plus", or punted and only
> used the literal "C++".
> 
> -- 
> --
> Ken Farinsky - CATS - (215) 431-9421 - Commodore Business Machines
> uucp: ...{uunet,rutgers}!cbmvax!ken
> bix:  kfarinsky


What about C more as in Semour (or however you spell the
person's name).