Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watserv1!maytag!xenitec!geoffw From: geoffw@xenitec.on.ca (Geoffrey Welsh) Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm Subject: Re: Desterm Summary: There's no real standard for "multi-Punter" transfers Keywords: Xmodem, Punter Message-ID: <1990Jul15.143655.16453@xenitec.on.ca> Date: 15 Jul 90 14:36:55 GMT References: <29742@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <15560@s.ms.uky.edu> <1990Jul2.025455.953@uoft02.utoledo.edu> <1990Jul6.060739.26286@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <3344@disk.UUCP> <1990Jul11.201551.2460@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <206@shiloh.UUCP> Reply-To: root@zswamp.fidonet.org (Geoffrey Welsh) Organization: XeniTec Consulting Services, Kitchener, ON, Canada Lines: 25 In article <206@shiloh.UUCP> cstewart@shiloh.UUCP (Chris Stewart) writes: >I would like to point out, in the documentation for Desterm that the >punter problem is mentioned. He had the specs for a newer version of >punter that I have never run across. It generally will work in single >transfer mode, but not multi-transfer mode. I think I should clarify this. The Punter protocols (PTP and C1, known as 'old' and 'new Punter' protocols, respectively) are clearly defined and DesTerm uses some of the code that Steve Punter released into the public domain for its C1 implementation. There are, as far as we have been able to find, THREE patches to the C1 code that were designed to allow batch transfers. These were never very well documented, and DesTerm 1.02 only supports the most recent of the three (the only robust version). DesTerm 2.0 should work with the second version of "multi-Punter" transfers. Please keep in mind that these batch alterations were not designed by Steve Punter! UUCP: watmath!xenitec!zswamp!root | 602-66 Mooregate Crescent Internet: root@zswamp.fidonet.org | Kitchener, Ontario FidoNet: SYSOP, 1:221/171 | N2M 5E6 CANADA Data: (519) 742-8939 | (519) 741-9553 My comments do not represent and should not obligate anyone but myself.