Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!ubc-cs!alberta!ccu!umturne4
From: umturne4@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Daryl Turner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Subject: Re: Desterm <was Re: Need help d/l w/Xmodem>
Message-ID: <1990Jul16.032451.8427@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
Date: 16 Jul 90 03:24:51 GMT
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Lines: 19

In article <1990Jul13.224750.15878@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> wlj1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Wayne L Jebian) writes:
>is there Desterm 2.0 yet?

Not yet, but any day soon, supposedly.  Matt is putting the final
touches on the manuals.

>I want to know if anyone has any experience with "Ultraterm V3.0" or
>Dialogue 128, or "handyterm 8.*" esp. with 2400. Since I call mostly C/G cBM
>BBS's, i have had problems multi d/ling on the Cnets but only the Cnets <128, 
>V4.0> 

Ultraterm III doesn't have a C/G mode...the most it can do is disable the
ASCII/PETSCII translation, which IMHO, doesn't match up to DesTerm.  The only
thing that Ultraterm has over DesTerm v1.02 is the ability to edit the buffer,
and built-in REU support.  Both of these deficiencies have been rectified with
the new version of DesTerm.  The other two, I have never seen.

   Daryl Turner
      <umturne4@ccu.umanitoba.ca>