Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:299 comp.sys.ibm.pc:54174
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!wuarchive!uwm.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!udder!edwards
From: edwards@udder.macc.wisc.edu (Mark Edwards)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Gateway2000 - opinions ?
Message-ID: <4053@dogie.macc.wisc.edu>
Date: 18 Jul 90 12:59:42 GMT
References: <1990Jul17.102103.11983@uwasa.fi> <90198.222303RFM@psuvm.psu.edu>
Sender: news@dogie.macc.wisc.edu
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Organization: University of Wisconson - Madison
Lines: 18

In article <90198.222303RFM@psuvm.psu.edu> RFM@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>contains a review of low-cost 386sx's. The GW2000 gets an "honorable
>mention" but not Editors Choice. Kinda picky. As I recall, their
>gripe was with the AT-size box as compared to the new. small-footprint

 I love mine. I got it back in January. I wanted a machine that was expandable.
I have both floppies, two half height harddrives, room for either a 
internal DAT or CD drive, and room to add more cards. With the smaller 
footprints somethings gotta give. The GATEWAY 2000 SX was written up in
January (or Febuary) in PC Magazine, also was compared in a January issue
of InfoWorld.

 My only compliant? I wish I had two of'em.

mark
--
    edwards@macc.wisc.edu
    UW-Madison, 1210 West Dayton St., Madison WI 53706