Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!boulder!stan!number6!kucharsk
From: kucharsk@number6.Solbourne.COM (William Kucharski)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: Hilarious Disinfectant 2.0
Message-ID: <1990Jul18.170921.27502@Solbourne.COM>
Date: 18 Jul 90 17:09:21 GMT
References: <1990Jul16.142942.2415@uunet!unhd> <1990Jul17.193436.5743@Solbourne.COM> <4700.26a4247b@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>
Sender: news@Solbourne.COM
Distribution: comp
Organization: Solbourne Computer, Inc., Longmont CO
Lines: 24

In article <4700.26a4247b@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> dhsy@vax5.cit.cornell.edu writes:
 >You are not supposed to do the "crunching" for a virus tool disk. By the way,
 >I've seen postings for sys+finder+disinf= 66K (44K, 36K) spare space. If it's
 >a newly formatted disk, why are all those differences?

Because I didn't go through the steps outlined in the Disinfectant 2.0 help
file to create a "Virus Tools" disk; rather I already had a boot floppy I was
using with an old version of Disinfectant and crunched and removed things
from the disk until Disinfectant 2.0 fit.  I'm guilty because my Virus Tools
disk does include superfluous things like Keyboard, Mouse, Key Layout, Monitors,
etc.

 >BTW II: 
 >The first thing that came up in my mind when I saw the program was the size,
 >same thought came up when I (like everybody else) supprised by the about box.
 >The I realized, that Disinfectant is so fine, so perfect a program that we
 >don't have anything else to complain about. It's the best.

Absolutely no argument from me there.
--
===============================================================================
| Internet:   kucharsk@Solbourne.COM	      |	William Kucharski             |
| uucp:	...!{boulder,sun,uunet}!stan!kucharsk |	Solbourne Computer, Inc.      |
= The opinions above are mine alone and NOT those of Solbourne Computer, Inc. =