Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!milton!milton.u.washington.edu!dennis
From: dennis@bailey.cpac.washington.edu (Dennis Gentry)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Debuggers for NeXT
Message-ID: <DENNIS.90Jul17125628@bailey.cpac.washington.edu>
Date: 17 Jul 90 19:56:28 GMT
References: <1990Jul11.165302.4186@dept.csci.unt.edu>
Sender: news@milton.u.washington.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: Center for Process Analytical Chemistry, U of Wash, Seattle
Lines: 15
In-reply-to: doug@dept.csci.unt.edu's message of 11 Jul 90 16:53:02 GMT


   Reply-To: doug@dept.csci.unt.edu (Douglas Scott)

   How
   about something like dbx -- gdb is ok, but not nearly as
  clever IMHO as dbx... ,besides...

In what way is gdb not nearly as clever as dbx?  As far as I
have been able to tell, gdb is far more clever than dbx.  Has
dbx improved substantially since I switched to gdb a year or so
ago?

Thanks,
Dennis
(dennis@cs.washington.edu)