Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uhccux!ames!ads.com!decwrl!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!humu!pegasus!pilikia!art
From: art@pilikia.pegasus.com (Art Neilson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: Interactive and me - An open letter to ISC.
Message-ID: <1990Jul13.182638.2572@pilikia.pegasus.com>
Date: 13 Jul 90 18:26:38 GMT
References: <3126@rsiatl.UUCP> <783@digi.lonestar.org>
Organization: Pilikia, Honolulu
Lines: 15
X-Local-Date: 13 Jul 90 11:26:38 PDT

In article <783@digi.lonestar.org> cfoughty@digi.lonestar.org (Cy Foughty) writes:
>
>Please don't flame me to hard. OS/2 1.2 provides a much
>better solution. Costs less, easier to ADMIN, and needs a
>lot less iron. A much richer programming environment and soooo
>much easier to connect to a network. I know this is a Unix
>based network, but if one evaluates OBJECTIVELY, OS/2 vs. Unix
>OS/2 wins in most of the categories, not all, but most. The most

PLEASE don't post this kind of crap here, at best you'll only
start a flame fest.  If I want to read about OS/2 I'll go read
the comp.os.os2 newsgroup.  Cancel this thing, please!
-- 
Arthur W. Neilson III		| ARPA: art@pilikia.pegasus.com
Bank of Hawaii Tech Support	| UUCP: uunet!ucsd!nosc!pegasus!pilikia!art