Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!bin
From: bin@primate.wisc.edu (Brain in Neutral)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: DOS vs. UNIX lans
Message-ID: <2772@uakari.primate.wisc.edu>
Date: 18 Jul 90 15:13:27 GMT
References: <62@maxx.UUCP>
Sender: bin@primate.wisc.edu
Reply-To: bin@primate.wisc.edu
Lines: 12

From article <62@maxx.UUCP>, by tyager@maxx.UUCP (Tom Yager):
> Not so. We just published a product focus on DOS peer-to-peer LANs. You can
> share files and other resources with impunity. Every machine can be both a
> client and server without sacrificing the ability to run normal DOS
> applications. Some vendors do this better than others, but the best of the
> LANS bring to bear all of the power of a UNIX network except remote-execution
> capability.

Meaning no rsh or rcp?  No small deficiency...

Paul DuBois
dubois@primate.wisc.edu