Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!helios.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!uplherc!esunix!bgeer From: bgeer@esunix.UUCP (Bob Geer) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: Logitech bus mouse; screen peace (no relation implied!) Message-ID: <2066@esunix.UUCP> Date: 17 Jul 90 03:31:22 GMT References: <11251@rouge.usl.edu> Organization: Evans & Sutherland, Salt Lake City, Utah Lines: 16 X-Local-Date: 16 Jul 90 20:31:22 PDT >From article <11251@rouge.usl.edu>, by ewe@gator.cacs.usl.edu (Edwin Wallace Elberson): >> In article ed@sli.com writes: >>I tried to replace my mouse with a Logitech bus mouse (c9). I have used the >>mouse on my ATI VGA wonder since windows was released. In that time I had not >>... > I too have an ATI VGA wonder, but when I got my Logitech bus mouse, I disabled > the ATI mouse interface and I'm using the board that came with the mouse. When >... More than one reference to replacing an ATI VGA Wonder's mouse with another. I too have an ATI VGA Wonder 512k on a 386-20 DTK motherboard, I plan to install Win3.0 soon, but I wonder: why these mice replacements? Is it a matter of style, are three buttons preferable, more resolution, other problems, or ????? Much obliged, in advance...Bear-person