Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!ucbvax!ucsd!nic.cerf.net!pushp
From: pushp@nic.cerf.net (Pushpendra Mohta)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: DUPLICATE POSTINGS of Performance Analysis
Message-ID: <81@nic.cerf.net>
Date: 18 Jul 90 16:26:19 GMT
References: <9007172352.AA02257@idaho.inference>
Organization: CERFnet, La Jolla, CA
Lines: 20

In article <9007172352.AA02257@idaho.inference> freeman@idaho.inference.COM (Mark E. Freeman) writes:
>I have received this message about ten times.  Has 
>anyone else noticed this behavior?  So far, I haven't received
>duplicates of other messages from xpert@expo.lcs.mit.edu.
>
>-- Mark
>   freeman@inference.com
>

I cross-posted my original message to comp.windows.x, comp.windows.misc
and comp.theory. I wonder if all these groups are gatewayed to
the  xpert list. Even so , 10 times ?

I also wonder if the annoyance factor has contributed  to the lack
of any responses other than the "me too" kind. The summary on  
performance will have to wait.I now know where the protocol is 
documented.

Thanks
--pushpendra