Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!119!5.0!Danny.Keys
From: Danny.Keys@p0.f5.n119.z1.fidonet.org (Danny Keys)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: Arkenstone
Message-ID: <12932@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 19 Jul 90 04:44:46 GMT
Sender: news@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Danny.Keys@p0.f5.n119.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:119/5.0 - Lazarus, Chico CA
Lines: 19
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 9325

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

Good work!
I agree with you.
There is one little fact that we should remember. Their will probably 
never be a scanning system which is absolute perfect.  They claim that 
the system has about a 90 percent rate of reading correctly.  Even the 
Kurzweil makes loads of mistakes.
Even though it is slow, the optacon is still the best for now.
But if you have lots of things to scan, well, well,******
So, again, i agree with you.
Mabey, electronick eyes are next.  ha/ha/ha/ha.
If you have the money, that is!

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!119!5.0!Danny.Keys
Internet: Danny.Keys@p0.f5.n119.z1.fidonet.org