Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!GAFFA.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@GAFFA.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: reviews
Message-ID: <9007200036.AA17859@das.llnl.gov>
Date: 20 Jul 90 00:36:17 GMT
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@gaffa.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@gaffa.MIT.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 18
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: ed@das.llnl.gov (Edward Suranyi)

I posted this a while ago, but never saw it, so I'm reposting it.

>Really-From: nrc@cbema.att.com (Neal R Caldwell, Ii)
>Like it or not the general consensus among critics and fans alike
>seems to be that _TSW_ is not as great a work as some of her previous 
>efforts.

Well, this is just plain WRONG.  The British reviews of _TSW_ were the
best she's ever gotten.  Almost every major British music magazine gave
the album a rave, with words like "brilliant" and "genius" being tossed around.

American reviews weren't quite as good as for _Hounds Of Love_, but still
they were mostly very favorable.

Ed
ed@das.llnl.gov