Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: 0002003441@mcimail.com (Paul Wilczynski)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Fun With ANI
Message-ID: <9922@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 19 Jul 90 09:20:00 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 13
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 499, Message 4 of 14


John R. Levine <johnl@esegue.segue.boston.ma.us> writes ...

> Oh, well.  I thought that 800 ANI delivery was only implemented
> for extremely high volume Megacom applications, which this is probably
> not.
 
I have an AT&T ReadyLine 800 number ($20/month plus cost of the calls)
and I get the phone numbers of most of the people who call my 800
number.


Paul Wilczynski