Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!bu.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: ben@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com (Benjamin Ellsworth)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Caller ID Update
Message-ID: <10039@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 24 Jul 90 00:35:33 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 18
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 508, Message 4 of 5


Does anyone know, or will anyone speculate about the impact the recent
state rulings regarding CID will have on 800 ANI?  I mean if it's
illegal for an individual to find out the caller's number, then it's
illegal no matter how it is marketted.  Right?


Benjamin Ellsworth      | ben@cv.hp.com                | INTERNET

                     All relevant disclaimers apply.


[Moderator's Note: Except that you are entitled to the information if
you are paying for the call, which is what 800 calls are about: the
receiver automatically paying for the call, although there is a
difference between real-time delivery of the information such as
American Express receives versus billing information supplied up to a
month later, such as I receive.  PT]