Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!sgi!cdp!consensus From: consensus@cdp.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.groupware Subject: Re: Groupware effects (was Re: Peer Message-ID: <1138200036@cdp> Date: 4 Jul 90 03:19:00 GMT References: <2004@east.east.sun.com> Lines: 33 Nf-ID: #R:east.east.sun.com:2004:cdp:1138200036:000:1697 Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!consensus Jul 3 20:19:00 1990 Subj: corporate heirarchies 90-07-01 22:21:34 EDT From: ShepT I actually fully agree that ultimately someone needs to be allowed to make decisions, even decisions that affect others. I am fully aware that, if given the chance, many groups will chatter on endlessly about needless details - and not decide efficiently because of it. (I have been the president of a software company for several years, and I have made many decisions affecting everybody.) Nonetheless, in order for the captain to make decisions he/she needs to have input from the crew. And this communication should be facilitated, not stunted, by groupware. A well run ship is one where the crew is free, and encouraged, to provide info from their areas of expertise - leaving the captain to put all the pieces together into his/her ultimate decsion. Kent, your argument about being endlessly "nattered" by everyone would seem to also be arguing against simple email. (Or the telephone, for that matter.) Software should allow and support many forms of communication, going in all sorts of directions. It should be up to the organization involved to set appropriate standards against unnecessary chatter, it should absolutely not be dictated by the software itself. * The preceeding is reply is cross-posted from the Groupware SIG on * America Online. To reply to an individual on America Online, contact: * * Christopher Allen - Consensus Development * P.O. Box 2836, Union City, CA 94587-7836 * AT&T: (415) 487-9206 * America Online: AFL MacDev * AppleLink, GEnie, MacNET, MCI: Consensus * Internet: cdp!consensus@labrea.stanford.edu * UUCP: uunet!pyramid!cdp!consensus