Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!meyerhof.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu!stanh From: stanh@meyerhof.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu (Stan Hanks) Newsgroups: comp.groupware Subject: Re: Groupware Effects on Hierarchies Message-ID: <1418@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> Date: 20 Jul 90 03:06:08 GMT References: <1990Jun24.130413.16511@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <2092@east.East.Sun.COM> Sender: usenet@bcm.tmc.edu Reply-To: stanh@meyerhof.iaims.bcm.tmc.edu (Stan Hanks) Organization: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX Lines: 25 Nntp-Posting-Host: Regarding scheduling, have you considered this: if the user hasn't blocked it off, it *SHOULD* be free to be scheduled by someone else. That makes it the responsibility of the user to block his own time. I know I routinely block the hour before and after lunch, the first and last hours of the day, and other blocks of time during the week to do "real work" rather than going to meetings, etc. which is largely what I seem to be mostly doing these days. Every scheduling system I have ever used, from (God forbid!) PROFS under VM/CMS through Post-Its and a secretary has had this feature. And, there's a reason for it: there is about a 85% chance at any given time that I just won't be available for any kind of interactive scheduling. If someone else can't just schedule time with me, frankly it just won't happen. I strongly recommend that you talk to people who are substantially busier than you are before deciding how stuff like this ought to work. Stanley P. Hanks Direeecttor, Information Technology Planning and Development Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston TX 77030, Mail Stop: IR-3 e-mail: stanh@bcm.tmc.edu voice: (713) 798-4649 fax: (713) 798-3729