Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!taumet!steve
From: steve@taumet.com (Stephen Clamage)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: const member functions: why bother the programmer?
Message-ID: <334@taumet.com>
Date: 24 Jul 90 21:54:22 GMT
References: <2026@kulcs.kulcs.uucp> <333@taumet.com>
Organization: Taumetric Corporation, San Diego
Lines: 10

I wrote:

>When there is only one member function with a given signature, the
>compiler could in principle determine whether any assignments were
>possibly made to the object, and classify the object as const.
                                               ^^^^^^
should be "function", not "object".  sorry.
-- 

Steve Clamage, TauMetric Corp, steve@taumet.com