Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!pacbell.com!ames!haven!decuac!shlump.nac.dec.com!e2big.mko.dec.com!ceomax!gillett From: gillett@ceomax..dec.com (Christopher Gillett) Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: GNU Fortran: Help, Anyone? Message-ID: <389@e2big.mko.dec.com> Date: 23 Jul 90 00:39:19 GMT References: < <1990Jul17.165053.2336@mtcchi.uucp>> <1990Jul22.085640.19254@mtcchi.uucp> Sender: usenet@e2big.mko.dec.com Reply-To: gillett@ceomax.dec.com (Christopher Gillett) Distribution: comp Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Semiconductor Engineering Group Lines: 24 In article <1990Jul22.085640.19254@mtcchi.uucp> levy@mtcchi.uucp (2656-Daniel R. Levy(0000000)0000) writes: [stuff deleted] >True in theory. In practice, I've found the output of f2c to produce faster >code than f77 on every UNIX platform I've tried (including Sun, who has really >jazzed up their f77 implementation) [more stuff deleted] Ok, as a good and faithful Digital employee, I have to ask..... What about f2c versus f77 under Ultrix (risc, DS3100)? BTW, if you have good benchmarks, it would be really interesting to see your results. > Daniel R. Levy * Memorex Telex * Naperville IL * ..!uunet!tellab5!mtcchi!levy Just Curious, /Chris --- Christopher Gillett gillett@ceomax.dec.com Digital Equipment Corporation {decwrl,decpa}!ceomax.dec.com!gillett Hudson, Taxachusetts (508) 568-7172