Xref: utzoo news.groups:22670 alt.fax:792 comp.misc:9644 comp.mail.misc:3720
Path: utzoo!mnetor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!math.lsa.umich.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!spdcc!eli
From: eli@spdcc.COM (Steve Elias)
Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.fax,comp.misc,comp.mail.misc
Subject: Re: why is fax alt?
Keywords: FAX server, Netware 2.15
Message-ID: <3474@ursa-major.SPDCC.COM>
Date: 25 Jul 90 12:09:18 GMT
References: <17120@haddock.ima.isc.com> <1990Jul20.051009.24759@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <3423@ursa-major.SPDCC.COM> <1990Jul24.221621.2509@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>
Reply-To: eli@ursa-major.spdcc.COM (Steve Elias)
Lines: 24


 xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes:
>i wrote about computerfax:

>>and voila -- a thermal-paper tree is saved.
>
>Sure, but why go to all that trouble to raise the cost of email from $0.0025
>(batched transmission) to $2.50 (long distance call)?

that's a real intense cost analysis you've got there, KPD.

>Fax is what you do when you're too lazy to hack the politics of making email
>work right.

what cogency!  what an astute analysis!  what a  M A R O O N !

p.s.  what are the "politics of making email work right" ???

are we talking about "email political correctness"??  guffaw.


-- 
/eli
eli@spdcc.com