Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: ".phone" domain (Re: Imminent death of UUCP Zone predicted) Message-ID: Date: 22 Jul 90 16:05:01 GMT References: <1990Jul16.202721.271@chinet.chi.il.us> <11R41EF@xds13.ferranti.com> <961@van-bc.wimsey.bc.ca> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 12 In article <961@van-bc.wimsey.bc.ca> sl@van-bc.wimsey.bc.ca (Stuart Lynne) writes: > Are we going to allow them in routes? > site_a!site_b!+18005551234.phone!site_c!site_d!user Probably worthwhile, but more likely you'd only have the .phone element in the first or last part of the path. And I suspect that most sites would only allow a very limited set of non-local calls (matching the phone numbers of their regular UUCP connections) for off-site senders. +17134385018.phone!jumpbid.hackercorp.com!peter uunet!texbell!nuchat!4385018.phone!peter -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. 'U`