Xref: utzoo news.groups:22581 alt.fax:779 comp.misc:9608
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!snorkelwacker!spdcc!eli
From: eli@spdcc.COM (Steve Elias)
Newsgroups: news.groups,alt.fax,comp.misc
Subject: Re: why is fax alt?
Keywords: FAX server, Netware 2.15
Message-ID: <3423@ursa-major.SPDCC.COM>
Date: 20 Jul 90 14:37:35 GMT
References: <1990Jul18.213944.7840@math.lsa.umich.edu> <3411@ursa-major.SPDCC.COM> <17120@haddock.ima.isc.com> <1990Jul20.051009.24759@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>
Reply-To: eli@ursa-major.spdcc.COM (Steve Elias)
Lines: 19


 xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes:
>>>
>>>isn't computerfax a real enough technology to warrant a comp.fax newsgroup?
>
>Actually, it should probably be ignored as yet another environmentally
>destructive fad yuppie nuisance toy in hopes it will go away soon.

hey now!  computerfax ain't environmentally destructive, unless you 
think phone calls destroy the environment.  with computerfax, nothing has
to be printed unless you like the way it previews on your workstation.
and voila -- a thermal-paper tree is saved.




-- 
/eli
eli@spdcc.com