Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!sunybcs!uhura.cc.rochester.edu!ttak
From: ttak@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Timothy Takahashi)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
Subject: Re: DR-DOS
Keywords: DRDOS,comments
Message-ID: <8502@ur-cc.UUCP>
Date: 20 Jul 90 13:56:56 GMT
References: <1121@fang.dsto.oz>
Reply-To: ttak@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Timothy Takahashi)
Organization: University of Rochester
Lines: 11

In article <1121@fang.dsto.oz> hjh@aeg.dsto.oz.au (H.J.Harvey-AEG) writes:
>I have been running DR-DOS V3.41 for several months and have been very pleased
>with it.  Sure, there are a few differences, but the only real problem has
>been its inability to work 100% with PC-NFS.

I've heard of Dr-DOS, but never actually seen anybody run it. What are the
"few differences?" Is it better/faster/smaller than MS-DOS?

Just curious,

tim