Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!VENERA.ISI.EDU!postel
From: postel@VENERA.ISI.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Is underscore legal in the local-part of an address?
Message-ID: <9007232002.AA13897@bel.isi.edu>
Date: 23 Jul 90 20:02:07 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 29

Oh.

In that case, you are wrong, and he is right.

--jon.

----- Begin Included Message -----
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 90 11:19 CDT
From: Michael Califf <CALIFFM%BAYLOR.BITNET@ricevm1.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: Is underscore legal in the local-part of an address?
To: TCP-IP@NIC.DDN.MIL

Don't Panic -

It turns out that the INTERBIT site which was rejecting the messages
is rejecting them based on the (illegal) underscore in the domain part
of the address, NOT the (legal) underscore in the local-part.

I am taking measures locally to remove/replace the underscores from
the offending node names.

That'll teach me to O.K. node names before fully parsing the RFC's :-)

Sorry about that,

Mike Califf                    (POSTMAST[ER])
Communications Software Coord  Internet: califfm@baylor.edu
Baylor University C.C.I.S.     Bitnet:   CALIFFM@BAYLOR
----- End Included Message -----